Evolutionary Theory of Advanced AI Adaptations
A general theory of the pressures that shape the behavioral dispositions of advanced AI systems as they are trained and deployed, and of how those pressures bear on alignment. Current work gives an epistemic interpretation of the power-seeking theorems.
Led by Aydin Mohseni and Daniel Herrmann
Overview
Which pressures shape the behavioral dispositions of AI systems as they are trained and deployed, and how do those pressures bear on alignment?
Claims that capable AI systems will seek power, resist shutdown, or deceive their overseers are usually stated loosely. We treat each such claim of instrumental convergenceInstrumental convergence: the thesis that agents with very different final goals will pursue similar intermediate goals, such as acquiring resources, because those goals help with almost any final goal. as a claim with six parts:
Systems of kind A, trained by processes T, on tasks and data distributed as D, converge in sense C to behavior pattern B in situations S.
The behavior patterns B in view include coherence, coordination, collusion, deception, learning, situational awareness, proxy gaming, power-seeking, resource acquisition, and self-preservation. Current work concerns power-seeking.
Current work
The power-seeking theorems
Turner and colleagues proved that, for most reward functions, optimal policies tend to seek power.A. M. Turner, L. Smith, R. Shah, A. Critch, and P. Tadepalli, “Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Power,” NeurIPS 2021; A. M. Turner and P. Tadepalli, “Parametrically Retargetable Decision-Makers Tend to Seek Power,” NeurIPS 2022. The proofs count reward functions by a symmetry argument that many readers find hard to interpret. We construct the prior that the counting assumes, which turns each result into a statement about probability. The probabilities then admit two interpretations.
| Epistemic | Frequency | |
|---|---|---|
| The probability is | an agent’s credence over its possible goals | the frequency of outcomes in a training or selection process |
| What converges | the choices of an expected-utility maximizer | behavioral rules, under Bayesian learning, reinforcement learning, imitation, or replicator dynamics |
| Whose beliefs | the agent’s | no one’s |
More research
- Naturalizing AgencyAgency
- Measuring Beliefs and Desires in AI SystemsInterpretability
- AI Alignment and DelegationAlignment